Research
Which conference/journal do you believe currently has the most fair and accurate review process?[D]
This r/MachineLearning discussion thread invites community members to share their opinions on which ML conferences or journals they consider to have the fairest and most accurate peer review processes
This r/MachineLearning discussion thread invites community members to share their opinions on which ML conferences or journals they consider to have the fairest and most accurate peer review processes, a topic of significant debate in the field. It reflects broader concerns about review quality at major venues such as NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR, where issues like randomness in acceptance decisions, institutional bias, and inconsistent reviewer standards have been widely documented. The thread likely surfaces community preferences and anecdotal experiences, touching on factors such as transparency, reviewer expertise, and whether open review platforms contribute to fairer outcomes.
Related
- TMLR reviews stalled [D]
- [[d-dealing-with-an-unprofessional-reviewer-using-fake-referen|[D] Dealing with an unprofessional reviewer using fake references and personal attacks in ICML26]]
- Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025 vs 2026 scores and WOW [D]
- So Confused about Polarizing ICML Reviews [D]
- Getting sabotaged by a reviewer at IJCAI [D]
Source: r/MachineLearning | 2026-04-13