Model Releases
š„: āWhile AI comes with danger, we should be sceptical of any narrative that conveys inevitability around its trajectory. AI systems do notā¦
š„: āWhile AI comes with danger, we should be sceptical of any narrative that conveys inevitability around its trajectory. AI systems do not build their own data centres. They do not manufacture their
š„: āWhile AI comes with danger, we should be sceptical of any narrative that conveys inevitability around its trajectory. AI systems do not build their own data centres. They do not manufacture their own chips or connect themselves to power grids. Humans decide which systems can access the internet, whether they can control machinery, move money or operate weapons. Humans build them, finance them, deploy them and decide what powers to give them. ā¦ Like every technology that has come before it, humans have agency over how AI is used. Instead of adopting a posture of fatalism, we should decide what kind of AI we want to build, what problems we want it to solve, and treat it as a tool rather than a force of nature.ā The belief that AI would eventually herald the end of humanity is not a new one. It has not arisen in response to the release of the LLMs of ChatGPT and Claude. It has not emerged as a response to recent technological developments. The story starts in the 90s, with @allTheYud. A ā¦
Related
- the crux of why AI safety in systems that are built around LLMs is never going to work: they just canāt be trusted to follow instructions.
- šØASI/AGI is imminent fans donāt realize that they ALREADY lost the argument around Astra. My argument (spelled out in detail in my Substackā¦
- Nvidia CEO @JensenHuang says GPT-6 Astra means āAGI has arrived.ā @GaryMarcus says that is false. He points to the same AGI declarations aroā¦
- so much for recursive self improvement, to the degree that it requires scientific taste
Source: Gary Marcus (X) | 2026-09-18