Who Gets the Kidney? Human-AI Alignment, Indecision, and Moral Values

arXiv:2506.00079v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) in high-stakes decision-making -- such as allocating scarce resources like donor organs -- raises critical questions about their alignment with human moral values. We systematically evaluate the behavior of several prominent LLMs against human preferences in kidney allocation scenarios and show that LLMs: i) exhibit stark deviations from human values in prioritizing various attributes, and ii) in contrast to humans, LLMs rarely express indecision, opting for deterministic decisions even when alternative indecision mechanisms (e.g., coin flipping) are provided. Nonetheless, we show that low-rank supervised fine-tuning with few samples is often effective in improving both decision consistency and calibrating indecision modeling. These findings illustrate the necessity of explicit alignment strategies for LLMs in moral/ethical domains.

Persona-Assigned Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Like Motivated Reasoning
Conformal Policy Control
The Two-Stage Decision-Sampling Hypothesis: Understanding the Emergence of Self-Reflection in RL-Trained LLMs
Mixture of Cognitive Reasoners: Modular Reasoning with Brain-Like Specialization

Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-04-21

Related