Live from Git

Living landscape

Enterprise AI Adoption

Explore documented AI business activity, including adoption, partnerships and deployments—and see what each source actually establishes.

Published snapshotBuilt from current wiki evidence

Compare

Compare evidence

Choose 2–4 entities for a side-by-side matrix. Unknowns stay visible instead of being inferred.

3 of 4 selected
✓ Impel✓ Creatio✓ CyberArk
Clear all

Decision view

What the wiki can establish

Evidence gaps remain visible as “Not established” instead of being filled by inference.

Use this matrix to compare published evidence—not to rank organisations or products. Each detailed claim links to its supporting wiki entry. Documented means that a source reported it, not that the wiki independently verified a causal outcome.

Business questionImpelCreatioCyberArk
What was rolled out
  • Impel deployed Claude Enterprise to more than 400 seats across knowledge work and engineering.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshotNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
Business workflow
  • Impel deployed Claude Enterprise to more than 400 seats across knowledge work and engineering.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Its teams use Claude Code for product development and a Claude-based roleplay agent to train over 150 customer-facing staff using scenarios informed by recorded dealer calls.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • The Creatio 10x release combines the company’s CRM applications with new tools for developing personal assistants, deterministic … The post Creatio expands beyond its no-code roots with conversational development tool and AI studio appeared first on SiliconANGLE.Source-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
Reported result
  • Anthropic's customer story says new-product ramp time fell from three to six months to roughly one month of roleplay and certification.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • It reports 20% more support cases handled with Claude-based triage and monthly business-review preparation falling from three to four hours to around 30 minutes.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • The authors report up to a 95% reduction in the time from support-case assignment to resolution: simple cases reportedly moved from 4–6 hours to 15–30 minutes, and complex cases from as long as 15 days to 2–4 hours.Source-reported · Read entry 1
Measurement basisNo source-linked detail in this snapshotNo source-linked detail in this snapshotNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
Limits and unknowns
  • These are vendor-published customer examples, not an independently controlled estimate of company-wide productivity.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Impel prioritises agent opportunities by business problem and still uses other models, so the account does not establish that every benefit or workflow is attributable solely to Claude.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • These results are customer/vendor-reported, not independently verified; the reported "up to" figure must not be read as an average.Source-reported · Read entry 1

Not directly comparable: reported results may use different measures, populations, baselines, methods or dates. Read each measurement basis and source before drawing a conclusion.

Snapshot classificationsContext, not cited per-cell claims

These classifications summarise each entity dossier; they are not individually cited claims. Open a linked claim above for source-specific detail.

ClassificationImpelCreatioCyberArk
Adoption stageProductionUnknownProduction
Business functionsNot establishedNot establishedCustomer Service
Outcome categoriesCycle TimeNot establishedCycle Time
Source date2026-09-162026-07-152026-02-18

Impel

Creatio

CyberArk

Add or change entities53 available