Live from Git

Living landscape

Enterprise AI Adoption

Explore documented AI business activity, including adoption, partnerships and deployments—and see what each source actually establishes.

Published snapshotBuilt from current wiki evidence

Latest publication

Executive briefing

A deterministic view of the latest published landscape and, when available, changes against an earlier ready snapshot. It is not a seven-day activity report, and no model fills facts in this view.

Published 12 Oct 2026 · comparison snapshot built 12 Oct 2026

3 supported changes
New entities
2
Evidence strengthened
0
Contradictions
0
Published entities
53

Current state

What the evidence says now

Current published coverage, separated from the snapshot change log. Counts describe this wiki—not the whole market.

17
documented adopters
15
with reported outcomes
6
business functions
74
published entries

Decision paths

Explore the workflows leaders ask about

Reported evidence

Evidence-backed results to inspect

These are source-reported claims, not verified ROI.

1Password

Its OpenAI customer story reports a 20.9% productivity improvement for a core engineering cohort and a 10.9% reduction in median pull-request cycle time. Source

Measurement basis
Not separately reported
Evidence limitation
Expansion to finance and marketing is described as a rollout, but the published productivity figures concern engineering and should not be generalized to those teams.
Pictet

Anthropic reports working prototypes built in two hours rather than two weeks in selected examples. Source

Measurement basis
Not separately reported
Evidence limitation
These examples are not an independently measured bank-wide productivity gain; the compliance comparison is against a projected effort, not a completed control-group baseline.
Atlassian

Atlassian reported a 30.8% reduction in median pull-request cycle time with its Claude-backed Rovo Dev Code Reviewer and 35.6% fewer human-written review comments. Source

Measurement basis
Not separately reported
Evidence limitation
The same story reports millions of Rovo Chat users but does not provide a controlled measure of Claude-specific productivity or customer outcomes.

Snapshot diff

What changed

  • Anthropic entered the published evidence view.
  • Samsung Electronics entered the published evidence view.
  • Deepgram left the current evidence view; this does not prove the entity or activity ceased.

Confidence movement

Evidence strengthened

No factual dimension gained another published source in this snapshot.

Decision support

Business implications to investigate

These are typed evidence dimensions and due-diligence prompts—not generated conclusions.

Change patterns in evidence

Workforce And Skills

Treat these as areas to examine, not forecasts or recommendations.

Unknowns

Evidence gaps and cautions

  • 39 entities rely on one published source.
  • 53 entities have only claimed or weak evidence.
  • 2 adopters have no published outcome category.

Evidence ledger

Current evidence for affected entities

These sources support the current entity dossiers; the snapshot diff does not yet attribute each changed dimension to a specific source.