Search: “legal”

arXiv:2605.01486v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal consultation is a high-stakes, knowledge-intensive task that requires agents to identify relevant legal issues, retrieve authoritative support, an

arXiv:2511.08605v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bangladesh's low-income population faces major barriers to affordable legal advice due to complex legal language, procedural opacity, and high costs

arXiv:2609.39071v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal language models require reward signals that capture not only answer correctness but also the multidimensional quality of legal responses. Existing

arXiv:2608.29284v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying large language models for legal question answering raises challenges that general-purpose leaderboards do not capture, particularly for low-re

arXiv:2608.17536v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal consultation questions exhibit multi-level complexity. A single retrieval strategy often leads to over-reasoning for simple questions and poor i

arXiv:2608.14210v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination is a major challenge for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems in the legal domain, where ungrounded answers can lead to serious

arXiv:2608.09106v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of legal tasks. In legal practice, time is a critical concept that

arXiv:2605.24454v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in the legal domain, demonstrating notable potential in Legal Question Answering (LQA). Howev

arXiv:2605.24452v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal NLP benchmarks evaluate models on randomly split data, implicitly assuming that legal language is stationary. We test this assumption by fine-tu

arXiv:2605.12012v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Public-sector legal departments in the Netherlands face acute staff shortages, increased case volumes, and increased pressure to meet regulatory com

arXiv:2605.07432v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chatbots are robots that can communicate with humans using text or voice signals. Legal chatbots improve access to justice, since legal representation a

arXiv:2605.00116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this article, we introduce ViLegalNLI, the first large-scale Vietnamese Natural Language Inference (NLI) dataset specifically constructed for the leg

New Zealand-based LawVu Ltd., a legal artificial intelligence startup, today announced the launch of Lens, an AI contract analysis tool that gives in-house legal teams visibility into risks and obliga

arXiv:2609.09754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models are increasingly deployed as tool-augmented legal agents, they introduce agentic hallucinations where tool-call and reasoning e

arXiv:2606.18699v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across diverse tasks, yet their performance on jurisdiction-specific legal rea

arXiv:2608.21089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into the Indian judiciary promises access to justice but introduces severe risks. We identify the 'inertia of c

arXiv:2608.20391v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most legal NLP resources draw from federal case law and focus on coarse classification, leaving administrative adjudication, where the vast majority of

arXiv:2608.20220v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal AI systems are increasingly used to answer legal questions, yet existing benchmarks assume queries arrive fully specified. In practice, users omit

arXiv:2608.14610v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal reasoning tasks such as legal judgment prediction (LJP) require identifying the temporally correct version of the law governing a case -- a capabi

arXiv:2608.04641v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI is transforming legal translation by introducing opportunities alongside linguistic, technical, legal, ethical and cognitive risks. This c

arXiv:2608.01559v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adversarial self-play is an appealing recipe for legal reasoning: have a student model draft an argument, have an adversary attack it, and reward the

arXiv:2606.07523v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal domains in high-resource languages like English have widely adopted artificial intelligence for legal question answering. However, data scarcity

arXiv:2605.08437v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing benchmarks for legal AI focus primarily on tasks where LLMs must produce legal arguments or documents, yet the capacity to judge such argumen

arXiv:2605.02308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Against the backdrop of rapid advances in artificial intelligence, legal argument mining has emerged as an important research area linking legal texts w

arXiv:2604.23730v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on legal benchmarks, including multiple-choice components of bar exams. However, their capaci

arXiv:2604.17543v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in general-domain tasks, yet their direct application to the legal domain remains challeng

Grok 4.7 ranks first in legal matters Today we are announcing Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 in collaboration with Harvey. This updates our scoring methodology for the Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) to add a halluci

arXiv:2610.08138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal intelligence aims to support reliable decision-making across long-horizon legal processes involving evolving case states and multiple roles. Howev

Artificial intelligence-driven law firm Arceus Legal today disclosed that it has raised 17 million in funding to expand beyond the commercial contract work it started with. Arceus provides legal servi

arXiv:2609.36707v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal contracts contain ambiguities that expose enterprises to financial and legal risks. Some ambiguities allow flexible interpretation without trigger

arXiv:2609.27009v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly applied to high-risk domains such as law, yet complex legal reasoning remains limited by two structural challenge

arXiv:2303.09136v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have transformed many fields, including natural language processing, computer vision, and reinforcement learning. These

arXiv:2609.02158v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) models are typically trained on documents that describe facts from a prosecutorial perspective. Existing datasets furt

arXiv:2507.08468v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper provides an experimental evaluation of the capability of large language models (LLMs) to assist in legal decision-making within the frame

arXiv:2607.29066v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deception detection has critical implications for legal proceedings, law enforcement, and online security. Although human judgment is limited in accur

arXiv:2605.25920v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) augmented with agentic search capabilities show promise for legal reasoning, they overlook a fundamental constraint

arXiv:2505.22003v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In India, access to legal assistance for the general public has been observed to have a critical gap, as many citizens are not able to take full adv

arXiv:2510.06002v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In high-stakes legal domains, retrieval must preserve not only semantic relevance, but also the hierarchy, temporality, and causal provenance of leg

arXiv:2604.26233v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are proposed as legal decision assistants, and even first-instance decision-makers, across a range of judicial and admin

OpenAI Group PBC today launched Astra for Law, a version of its GPT-6 Astra model set up for legal research and drafting. Astra for Law is not a new model. The company has wrapped GPT-6 Astra in a leg

arXiv:2608.28645v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-resource languages without an adequate training corpus often use a related, higher-resource language as a scaffold for comprehension. Still, there

arXiv:2608.30327v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fine-tuning can improve legal question-answering accuracy without improving how models use law supplied in context. We study this distinction in bilingu

Gilbert + Tobin uses ChatGPT and Codex in governed legal operations; OpenAI reports 87% active usage among enabled users.

arXiv:2608.24936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present GreenLeaf Law Embed Tiny, a 0.6B parameter embedding model for legal domain retrieval. GreenLeaf-Tiny achieves 75.11% on the Massive Legal

arXiv:2608.04011v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This article examines the enduring epistemic and methodological crisis of traditional legal practice in light of the opportunities and constraints int

LexisNexis Legal & Professional, a division of RELX plc, today announced the opening of its Customer Innovation Lab in New York City, which will deliver a new model for how legal artificial intelligen