Safety
All In’s @davidsacks liking one of my tweets was not in my 2026 bingo card.
The specific tweet from Gary Marcus (X post ID 2042361570253217968) is not publicly accessible without authentication, and the search results do not surface its specific content. Based on available...
The specific tweet from Gary Marcus (X post ID 2042361570253217968) is not publicly accessible without authentication, and the search results do not surface its specific content. Based on available context, here is the most accurate knowledge base entry possible:
Gary Marcus, cognitive scientist and AI critic, posted on X in 2026 noting his surprise that David Sacks — venture capitalist, co-host of the All In podcast, and former Trump White House AI and crypto czar — had liked one of his tweets, describing it as unexpected enough to be off his "2026 bingo card." The remark reflects the ideological distance between Marcus, a prominent skeptic of generative AI hype, and Sacks, known as an influential pro-innovation voice who advocated a light-touch regulatory approach to AI during his time as a special government employee. The post highlights an unusual moment of apparent agreement across a significant divide in the AI policy and commentary landscape.
Related
- Everything you need to know about “Open”AI’s claims to be working on AI “for the benefit of humanity”.
- Does anyone without a lot of money at stake seriously disagree?
- Stargate never made sense.
- GenAI’s popularity has hit a wall. Hard to see how OpenAI is going to make its numbers, and easy to see why they bought a media company. The…
- I agree totally @Gary. I’ve been saying this since the ChatGPT moment in Nov 22. Thank you for saying it out loud @demishassabis. Too much t…
Source: safety