Safety
Chain-in-Tree: Back to Sequential Reasoning in LLM Tree Search
arXiv:2509.25835v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Test-time scaling improves large language models (LLMs) on long-horizon reasoning tasks by allocating more compute at inference. LLM inference via t
arXiv:2509.25835v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Test-time scaling improves large language models (LLMs) on long-horizon reasoning tasks by allocating more compute at inference. LLM inference via tree search (LITS) achieves strong performance but is highly inefficient. We propose Chain-in-Tree (CiT), a plug-in framework that decides when to branch during search instead of expanding at every step. CiT introduces lightweight Branching Necessity (BN) evaluations, including BN-DP (direct prompting) and BN-SC (self-consistency). Integrated into Tree of Thoughts, ReST-MCTS, and RAP, BN-DP reduces token generation, model calls, and runtime by 75-85% on GSM8K and Math500, with often negligible or no accuracy loss. BN-SC typically yields substantial savings (up to 80%) generally but shows instability in 1-4 out of 14 settings, caused by a small subset of examples that produce extremely long reasoning steps. We theoretically prove that BN-DP never increases policy invocations and release unified implementations applicable across LITS frameworks. The full codebase is publicly available at https://github.com/xinzhel/chain_in_tree.
Related
- SPPO: Sequence-Level PPO for Long-Horizon Reasoning Tasks
- The Two-Stage Decision-Sampling Hypothesis: Understanding the Emergence of Self-Reflection in RL-Trained LLMs
- Reason in Chains, Learn in Trees: Self-Rectification and Grafting for Multi-turn Agent Policy Optimization
- StaRPO: Stability-Augmented Reinforcement Policy Optimization
- Reinforcement-aware Knowledge Distillation for LLM Reasoning
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-04-13