Safety
Learning to Refine: Self-Refinement of Parallel Reasoning in LLMs
arXiv:2509.00084v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Test-time scaling (TTS) has gained widespread attention for enhancing LLM reasoning. Existing approaches such as Best-of-N and majority voting
arXiv:2509.00084v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Test-time scaling (TTS) has gained widespread attention for enhancing LLM reasoning. Existing approaches such as Best-of-N and majority voting are limited as their performance depends on the quality of candidate responses, making them unable to produce a correct solution when all candidates are incorrect. Parallel self-refinement, generating multiple candidates and synthesizing a refined answer conditioned on them, offers a promising alternative, but the underlying mechanism driving its effectiveness remains obscure. To bridge this gap in understanding, we introduce a new metric, the Refinement Gap, designed to quantify the relative improvement of self-refinement beyond majority voting. We show that the Refinement Gap exhibits a clear scaling trend with model size and is only weakly correlated with the base capability. Based on this discovery, we propose Generative Self-Refinement (GSR), a parallel test-time scaling framework that transfers the refinement policy from larger teacher models with higher refinement gap into smaller students. Crucially, GSR jointly trains a single model to generate strong candidates and refine a better final answer based on these candidates. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across five mathematical benchmarks over other parallel aggregation methods, while the learned refinement skill transfers across multiple model scales and families and exhibits robust generalization to an out-of-distribution domain.
Related
- Chain-in-Tree: Back to Sequential Reasoning in LLM Tree Search
- Reinforcement-aware Knowledge Distillation for LLM Reasoning
- Not All Rollouts are Useful: Down-Sampling Rollouts in LLM Reinforcement Learning
- Rethinking Token-Level Credit Assignment in RLVR: A Polarity-Entropy Analysis
- Scheduling Your LLM Reinforcement Learning with Reasoning Trees
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-04-28