Research
Graph Surgery and the Do-Operator: A Precise Correspondence for Acyclic Structural Causal Models
arXiv:2608.17634v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The operatorname{do}-operator is described graphically by deleting arrows into its targets and functionally by replacing their mechanisms with constants
arXiv:2608.17634v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The operatorname{do}-operator is described graphically by deleting arrows into its targets and functionally by replacing their mechanisms with constants. To call these operations equivalent is not yet a mathematical statement: one returns a graph and remembers only the targets, whereas the other returns mechanisms and also remembers the imposed values. We make a dependency-level comparison precise for deterministic acyclic structural causal models with finitely many endogenous variables. If operatorname{Graph}(F) extracts the dependencies of a mechanism family F, our main theorem is operatorname{Graph}(F^iota)=operatorname{Surg}(operatorname{Graph}(F),T_iota). Thus replacing target mechanisms removes exactly the dependencies removed by graph surgery. For a model M=(G,F) whose graph may contain unused arrows, we characterize when the same equality holds with G in place of operatorname{Graph}(F); it holds for every intervention exactly when G records the dependencies of F exactly. We then define the intervened model, characterize its run, show how sequential interventions combine, and prove that an outcome depends only on interventions at its actual dependency ancestors.
Related
- Formalizing and falsifying causal pathways of rare events
- Regret-Based Federated Causal Discovery with Unknown Interventions
- On the Relationship between Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Structural Causal Models
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-19