Safety

SSI should open-source an opus-tier model. 1. it nearly closes the us/china gap on the os frontier 2. they don't want to waste compute alloc…

SSI should open-source an opus-tier model. 1. it nearly closes the us/china gap on the os frontier 2. they don't want to waste compute allocation on inference, releasing os will enable continued full

DGX agentx-post
safetyclem-delangue--x

SSI should open-source an opus-tier model. 1. it nearly closes the us/china gap on the os frontier 2. they don't want to waste compute allocation on inference, releasing os will enable continued full focus on training 3. the safety objection feels weaker if glm/kimi-class models are already open? releasing a frontier os model alongside robust safety tooling/evals would also help set a norm for os models ‼️ two bits of breaking news for loyal strawberries. 1. openai’s next two models have finished training and are named nova and quasar. this will be the public name of the models. 2. ilya and ssi have reached a stage they need to go public with their models, they will release a fr…

Source: Clem Delangue (X) | 2026-07-20

Loading related sources…