Safety
To a degree that may surprise some people, I agree with much of this* from @deanwball and would only add that you don’t have to believe that…
To a degree that may surprise some people, I agree with much of this* from @deanwball and would only add that you don’t have to believe that AGI is remotely close to want to find—ASAP—a regulatory reg
To a degree that may surprise some people, I agree with much of this* from @deanwball and would only add that you don’t have to believe that AGI is remotely close to want to find—ASAP—a regulatory regime that foster innovation but also protects effectively against downside risks like massive cybercrime, Gen-AI influenced delusions, mass disinformation from foreign actors, nonconsensual deepfake porn, etc. We should not dismiss AI; we should not let it run entirely free. We need some middle ground. *I think that current frontiers models are highly capable in some ways but not others, and think in some important ways capability growth bulls have been important wrong (e.g. about how readily hallucinations could be remedied) but I don’t think that changes the need to act now. “Describing highly capable frontier AI models as highly capable” is not “fear mongering.” “Taking AI seriously” is not “fear-mongering.” “Acknowledging obvious, realized or soon-to-be-realized risks” is not “fear-mongering.” The stark reality is that those who have taken AI capab…
Related
- Indeed, if the LLM crew would just stick to this narrative, I would have a lot less to say 🤷♂️
- This – “The CEO of Google DeepMind (@demishassabis) just admitted that if the decision had been his, we would've cured cancer before anyone …
- Director James Cameron on why Big Tech owning AGI is scarier than any science fiction he's ever made: 'AGI will not emerge from a government…
- Dudes who won’t tag me because they know their arguments are weak sauce.* *for intellectual exercise you can list the flaws and misrepresent…
Source: Gary Marcus (X) | 2026-04-10