Live from Git

Living landscape

Enterprise AI Adoption

Explore documented AI business activity, including adoption, partnerships and deployments—and see what each source actually establishes.

Published snapshotBuilt from current wiki evidence

Compare

Compare evidence

Choose 2–4 entities for a side-by-side matrix. Unknowns stay visible instead of being inferred.

3 of 4 selected
✓ Certinia✓ Pictet✓ Impel
Clear all

Decision view

What the wiki can establish

Evidence gaps remain visible as “Not established” instead of being filled by inference.

Use this matrix to compare published evidence—not to rank organisations or products. Each detailed claim links to its supporting wiki entry. Documented means that a source reported it, not that the wiki independently verified a causal outcome.

Business questionCertiniaPictetImpel
What was rolled outNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • Pictet deployed Claude Code and Claude Cowork across engineering, product, and business teams, with access for about 700 people.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Impel deployed Claude Enterprise to more than 400 seats across knowledge work and engineering.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Business workflowNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • Pictet deployed Claude Code and Claude Cowork across engineering, product, and business teams, with access for about 700 people.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Impel deployed Claude Enterprise to more than 400 seats across knowledge work and engineering.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Its teams use Claude Code for product development and a Claude-based roleplay agent to train over 150 customer-facing staff using scenarios informed by recorded dealer calls.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Reported resultNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • Anthropic reports working prototypes built in two hours rather than two weeks in selected examples.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Anthropic's customer story says new-product ramp time fell from three to six months to roughly one month of roleplay and certification.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • It reports 20% more support cases handled with Claude-based triage and monthly business-review preparation falling from three to four hours to around 30 minutes.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Measurement basisNo source-linked detail in this snapshotMeasurement basis included in reported result aboveNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
Limits and unknownsNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • These examples are not an independently measured bank-wide productivity gain; the compliance comparison is against a projected effort, not a completed control-group baseline.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • These are vendor-published customer examples, not an independently controlled estimate of company-wide productivity.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Impel prioritises agent opportunities by business problem and still uses other models, so the account does not establish that every benefit or workflow is attributable solely to Claude.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1

Not directly comparable: reported results may use different measures, populations, baselines, methods or dates. Read each measurement basis and source before drawing a conclusion.

Snapshot classificationsContext, not cited per-cell claims

These classifications summarise each entity dossier; they are not individually cited claims. Open a linked claim above for source-specific detail.

ClassificationCertiniaPictetImpel
Adoption stageUnknownProductionProduction
Business functionsNot establishedNot establishedNot established
Outcome categoriesNot establishedCycle TimeCycle Time
Source date2026-07-302026-09-022026-09-16

Certinia

Pictet

Impel

Add or change entities53 available