Live from Git

Living landscape

Enterprise AI Adoption

Explore documented AI business activity, including adoption, partnerships and deployments—and see what each source actually establishes.

Published snapshotBuilt from current wiki evidence

Compare

Compare evidence

Choose 2–4 entities for a side-by-side matrix. Unknowns stay visible instead of being inferred.

3 of 4 selected
✓ Quantium✓ Tecban✓ GitLab
Clear all

Decision view

What the wiki can establish

Evidence gaps remain visible as “Not established” instead of being filled by inference.

Use this matrix to compare published evidence—not to rank organisations or products. Each detailed claim links to its supporting wiki entry. Documented means that a source reported it, not that the wiki independently verified a causal outcome.

Business questionQuantiumTecbanGitLab
What was rolled out
  • It reports that 89% of team members use AI daily, but does not establish that all of those users use Claude each day.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Microsoft's customer story says Tecban adopted Microsoft 365 Copilot and GitHub Copilot, recorded 98 use cases, completed 35, and onboarded more than 3,000 users.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
Business workflowNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • The case illustrates scaled adoption in a regulated banking environment, not a controlled causal estimate of Copilot's impact.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Anthropic's customer story says GitLab piloted Claude for Work internally for RFP responses, marketing content, technical documentation, small internal tools, and data analysis.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Reported result
  • The story says one bid-writing workflow cut work time by up to 90%.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • It reports that 98% of surveyed GitLab team members were satisfied or very satisfied and cites 25–50% productivity gains during the initial pilot.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Measurement basisNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • The story also reports an estimated 30% development productivity gain and 14% testing gain.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
Limits and unknowns
  • These are vendor-published accounts of specific workflows, not independently measured productivity across Quantium.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • The page does not provide a detailed measurement protocol or prove Claude alone caused the changes.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • It reports that 89% of team members use AI daily, but does not establish that all of those users use Claude each day.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • The page does not state the survey sample, productivity baseline, or calculation method, so they should not be generalised to GitLab's entire workforce.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1

Not directly comparable: reported results may use different measures, populations, baselines, methods or dates. Read each measurement basis and source before drawing a conclusion.

Snapshot classificationsContext, not cited per-cell claims

These classifications summarise each entity dossier; they are not individually cited claims. Open a linked claim above for source-specific detail.

ClassificationQuantiumTecbanGitLab
Adoption stageProductionProductionPiloting
Business functionsSoftware DeliveryNot establishedSales Marketing
Outcome categoriesCycle TimeProductivityProductivity
Source date2025-04-032026-06-022026-09-02

Quantium

Tecban

GitLab

Add or change entities53 available