Live from Git

Living landscape

Enterprise AI Adoption

Explore documented AI business activity, including adoption, partnerships and deployments—and see what each source actually establishes.

Published snapshotBuilt from current wiki evidence

Compare

Compare evidence

Choose 2–4 entities for a side-by-side matrix. Unknowns stay visible instead of being inferred.

3 of 4 selected
✓ Zapier✓ IBM✓ Quantium
Clear all

Decision view

What the wiki can establish

Evidence gaps remain visible as “Not established” instead of being filled by inference.

Use this matrix to compare published evidence—not to rank organisations or products. Each detailed claim links to its supporting wiki entry. Documented means that a source reported it, not that the wiki independently verified a causal outcome.

Business questionZapierIBMQuantium
What was rolled out
  • The story cites 89% AI adoption across all Zapier employees and more than 800 internally deployed AI agents.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • It reports that 89% of team members use AI daily, but does not establish that all of those users use Claude each day.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Business workflow
  • Anthropic's customer story reports that Zapier adopted Claude Enterprise for work across product marketing, engineering, strategic research, and design.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshotNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
Reported result
  • Zapier says its support team's AI ticket-summarisation tool, Sidekick, halved average handle time.Adopter-published · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • The story says one bid-writing workflow cut work time by up to 90%.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Measurement basisNo source-linked detail in this snapshotNo source-linked detail in this snapshotNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
Limits and unknowns
  • Anthropic's earlier customer story reported 89% AI adoption; the figures refer to different dates and should not be treated as competing estimates for the same moment.Adopter-published · Read entry 1
  • Its claims are vendor-published and should not be presented as an independent outcome evaluation.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • These are vendor-published accounts of specific workflows, not independently measured productivity across Quantium.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • The page does not provide a detailed measurement protocol or prove Claude alone caused the changes.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • It reports that 89% of team members use AI daily, but does not establish that all of those users use Claude each day.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1

Not directly comparable: reported results may use different measures, populations, baselines, methods or dates. Read each measurement basis and source before drawing a conclusion.

Snapshot classificationsContext, not cited per-cell claims

These classifications summarise each entity dossier; they are not individually cited claims. Open a linked claim above for source-specific detail.

ClassificationZapierIBMQuantium
Adoption stageProductionUnknownProduction
Business functionsResearch, Sales MarketingNot establishedSoftware Delivery
Outcome categoriesCycle TimeNot establishedCycle Time
Source date2026-01-082026-05-282025-04-03

Zapier

IBM

Quantium

Add or change entities53 available