Live from Git

Living landscape

Enterprise AI Adoption

Explore documented AI business activity, including adoption, partnerships and deployments—and see what each source actually establishes.

Published snapshotBuilt from current wiki evidence

Compare

Compare evidence

Choose 2–4 entities for a side-by-side matrix. Unknowns stay visible instead of being inferred.

3 of 4 selected
✓ 1Password✓ Pictet✓ Vercel
Clear all

Decision view

What the wiki can establish

Evidence gaps remain visible as “Not established” instead of being filled by inference.

Use this matrix to compare published evidence—not to rank organisations or products. Each detailed claim links to its supporting wiki entry. Documented means that a source reported it, not that the wiki independently verified a causal outcome.

Business question1PasswordPictetVercel
What was rolled outNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • Pictet deployed Claude Code and Claude Cowork across engineering, product, and business teams, with access for about 700 people.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
Business workflow
  • 1Password deployed Codex across planning, implementation, review, testing, and production investigation.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Pictet deployed Claude Code and Claude Cowork across engineering, product, and business teams, with access for about 700 people.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
Reported result
  • Its OpenAI customer story reports a 20.9% productivity improvement for a core engineering cohort and a 10.9% reduction in median pull-request cycle time.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • For its Finance AI Hackathon, 1Password says 90 team members built 21 agents and that those agents save the team 5–10 hours per person per week.Source-reported · Read entry 1
  • Anthropic reports working prototypes built in two hours rather than two weeks in selected examples.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot
Measurement basis
  • The company estimates a 553% ROI and about $784,000 of annual engineering capacity for a modelled group of 50 consistent users.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • The ROI is modelled, not a realised cash saving or an independently verified causal effect.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Measurement basis included in reported result aboveNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
Limits and unknowns
  • Expansion to finance and marketing is described as a rollout, but the published productivity figures concern engineering and should not be generalized to those teams.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • The ROI is modelled, not a realised cash saving or an independently verified causal effect.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • These examples are not an independently measured bank-wide productivity gain; the compliance comparison is against a projected effort, not a completed control-group baseline.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
No source-linked detail in this snapshot

Not directly comparable: reported results may use different measures, populations, baselines, methods or dates. Read each measurement basis and source before drawing a conclusion.

Snapshot classificationsContext, not cited per-cell claims

These classifications summarise each entity dossier; they are not individually cited claims. Open a linked claim above for source-specific detail.

Classification1PasswordPictetVercel
Adoption stageProductionProductionUnknown
Business functionsFinance, Software DeliveryNot establishedNot established
Outcome categoriesCycle Time, ProductivityCycle TimeNot established
Source date2026-09-082026-09-022026-09-09

1Password

Pictet

Vercel

Add or change entities53 available