Living landscape

Enterprise AI Adoption

Explore documented AI business activity, including adoption, partnerships and deployments—and see what each source actually establishes.

Published snapshotBuilt from current wiki evidence

Compare

Compare evidence

Choose 2–4 entities for a side-by-side matrix. Unknowns stay visible instead of being inferred.

4 of 4 selected

Decision view

What the wiki can establish

Evidence gaps remain visible as “Not established” instead of being filled by inference.

Use this matrix to compare published evidence—not to rank organisations or products. Each detailed claim links to its supporting wiki entry. Documented means that a source reported it, not that the wiki independently verified a causal outcome.

Business questionHPE1PasswordAtlassianZapier
What was rolled outNo source-linked detail in this snapshotNo source-linked detail in this snapshotNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • The story cites 89% AI adoption across all Zapier employees and more than 800 internally deployed AI agents.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Business workflowNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • 1Password deployed Codex across planning, implementation, review, testing, and production investigation.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Atlassian uses Claude for complex and long-running workflows in Rovo Chat, Rovo CLI, and early-access Rovo Max, while Claude Code is used within engineering and was piloted in non-technical teams.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Its April 2026 engineering account says the system used Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet to generate review suggestions, alongside separate quality checks.Source-reported · Read entry 1
  • Anthropic's customer story reports that Zapier adopted Claude Enterprise for work across product marketing, engineering, strategic research, and design.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Reported resultNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • Its OpenAI customer story reports a 20.9% productivity improvement for a core engineering cohort and a 10.9% reduction in median pull-request cycle time.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • For its Finance AI Hackathon, 1Password says 90 team members built 21 agents and that those agents save the team 5–10 hours per person per week.Source-reported · Read entry 1
  • Atlassian reported a 30.8% reduction in median pull-request cycle time with its Claude-backed Rovo Dev Code Reviewer and 35.6% fewer human-written review comments.Source-reported · Read entry 1
  • Zapier says its support team's AI ticket-summarisation tool, Sidekick, halved average handle time.Adopter-published · Read entry 1
Measurement basisNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • The company estimates a 553% ROI and about $784,000 of annual engineering capacity for a modelled group of 50 consistent users.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • The ROI is modelled, not a realised cash saving or an independently verified causal effect.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
Measurement basis included in reported result aboveNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
Limits and unknownsNo source-linked detail in this snapshot
  • Expansion to finance and marketing is described as a rollout, but the published productivity figures concern engineering and should not be generalized to those teams.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • The ROI is modelled, not a realised cash saving or an independently verified causal effect.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • The same story reports millions of Rovo Chat users but does not provide a controlled measure of Claude-specific productivity or customer outcomes.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • Anthropic's customer story says more than five million AI agents ran in customer business workflows in one month, but does not attribute all those executions to Claude; Rovo uses multiple models.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1
  • It does not independently validate the adoption scale in Anthropic's customer story, nor establish a Claude-specific productivity outcome.Adopter-published · Read entry 1
  • Anthropic's earlier customer story reported 89% AI adoption; the figures refer to different dates and should not be treated as competing estimates for the same moment.Adopter-published · Read entry 1
  • Its claims are vendor-published and should not be presented as an independent outcome evaluation.Vendor-reported · Read entry 1

Not directly comparable: reported results may use different measures, populations, baselines, methods or dates. Read each measurement basis and source before drawing a conclusion.

Snapshot classificationsContext, not cited per-cell claims

These classifications summarise each entity dossier; they are not individually cited claims. Open a linked claim above for source-specific detail.

ClassificationHPE1PasswordAtlassianZapier
Adoption stageUnknownProductionProductionProduction
Business functionsNot establishedFinance, Software DeliveryNot establishedResearch, Sales Marketing
Outcome categoriesNot establishedCycle Time, ProductivityCycle TimeCycle Time
Source date2026-06-102026-09-082026-08-282026-01-08
Add or change entities53 available
  • 1PasswordOrganisation · 2 sources
    Remove 1Password
  • AARPOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • AWSOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • AccentureOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • AdobeOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • Akash SystemsOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • AmazonOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • AnthropicOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • Applied MaterialsOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • AtlassianOrganisation · 3 sources
    Remove Atlassian
  • BBVAOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • Bristol Myers SquibbOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • CertiniaOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • ChocoOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • CiscoOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • CoinbaseOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • CreatioOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • CrowdStrikeOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • CursorOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • CyberAgentOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • CyberArkOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • DoorDashOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • FacebookOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • FluxOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • FortinetOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • Gilbert + TobinOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • GitLabOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • GoogleOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • HPEOrganisation · 2 sources
    Remove HPE
  • IBMOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • ImpelOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • IntuitOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • MetaOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • NetAppOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • OpenAIOrganisation · 8 sources
    Limit reached
  • Oriole NetworksOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • PermisoOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • PictetOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • PwCOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • PythianOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • QontoOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • QuantiumOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • Red HatOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • RedditOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • Regal RexnordOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • S&P GlobalOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • Samsung ElectronicsOrganisation · 2 sources
    Limit reached
  • Sun LifeOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • TecbanOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • VercelOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • WorkdayOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • World Bank GroupOrganisation · 1 source
    Limit reached
  • ZapierOrganisation · 2 sources
    Remove Zapier